• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Population Dynamics Research CentersPopulation Dynamics Research Centers

  • About
  • Research Highlights
  • Publications
  • Tools & Training
    • Support for Writing Research Briefs
    • Introduction to Using Twitter for Social Science
    • Expanding the Reach of Your Research: Best Practices for Communicating with Policymakers and the Media
    • New Tools and Best Practices in Communicating Research Results to Media and Policy Audiences
    • Communicating With Media Audiences
    • Communicating With Policy Audiences
  • Special Topics
    • Coronavirus
    • Maternal Health
  • News
Home > Research Highlights > Exclusionary Discipline Threatens Youth Mental Health, but Protective Factors Can Help

Exclusionary Discipline Threatens Youth Mental Health, but Protective Factors Can Help

January 2025

Suspension and other forms of exclusionary discipline put students at increased risk for dropping out, experiencing employment problems later in life, and becoming involved with the criminal justice system—all with very little evidence that they make schools safer or improve student behavior. Such practices are also linked to poorer emotional health for young people, according to a new study by Marvin So and colleagues at the University of Minnesota.1

Using data from the 2019 Minnesota Student Survey, So and team looked at 8th, 9th, and 11th grade public school students who had missed class in the previous month due to detention or suspension to see whether they were more likely than their peers to be depressed or anxious. The researchers also assessed whether certain supports, like extracurricular activities or healthy relationships with parents, protected against depression and anxiety symptoms.

Exclusionary Discipline Is Not Experienced Equally, but Its Impacts on Mental Health Are Universal

More than one in 10 students surveyed had experienced exclusionary discipline in the previous month. Certain groups were more likely to be disciplined, including students who reported family poverty, race/ethnicity other than non-Hispanic white, non-binary gender, special education participation, or multiple adverse childhood experiences.

Overall, the researchers found a 64% increase in odds for depression symptoms and a 49% increase in odds for anxiety symptoms among students who had experienced exclusionary discipline. Across racial/ethnic groups (American Indian/Alaska Native, Black, Hispanic/Latinx, white, another race/ethnicity), associations between exclusionary discipline and mental health symptoms were significant with one exception: Exclusionary discipline did not significantly increase odds for anxiety among American Indian/Alaska Native youth.

Anxiety and depression in youth, particularly if untreated, can lead to academic problems, substance misuse, suicidal behavior, and other long-term negative outcomes.

Protective Factors Benefit All Students

Psychosocial protective factors provide a buffer against symptoms of depression and anxiety for young people affected by exclusionary discipline. In the study, the presence of any of the nine protective factors examined—extracurricular opportunities, positive identity, social competency, parent connectedness, caring friends, caring adults in the community, adults at school to talk to, high-quality teacher-student relationships, and perceived school safety—was significantly correlated with reduced depression. And seven of the nine protective factors were significantly linked to reduced anxiety.

Protective factors also lowered the likelihood for depression and anxiety among those students in the survey who did not experience exclusionary discipline, and to a greater degree than those who did—a finding the researchers found surprising.

“Ultimately, results imply that protective factors support the health of youth irrespective of disciplinary experience,” they noted.

Reinterpreting ‘Misbehavior’ Could Translate to Improved Student Wellness

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) maintains that out-of-school suspensions and expulsions are “counterproductive to the intended goals, rarely if ever are necessary, and should not be considered as appropriate discipline in any but the most extreme and dangerous circumstances.”2 Instead, the AAP recommends a prevention approach—one that recognizes and addresses sociodemographic factors that put children at risk for problem behaviors and provides them with positive interventions before serious discipline problems arise.

The new study provides additional evidence for the disproportionate burden of exclusionary discipline on students with pre-existing economic, social, and family challenges, as well as the negative consequences of exclusionary discipline for those students. In this context, the researchers suggest, rethinking discipline is key. Disciplinary frameworks that interpret student misbehavior as a means of coping with challenges and adopt trauma-informed, restorative practices and support systems are likely to benefit students and their schools, they add.

Results of the study also suggest that educators and others should work to bolster protective factors to promote the emotional well-being of all young people—regardless of their experience with exclusionary discipline.


This article was produced under a grant from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). The work of researchers from the NICHD-funded Population Dynamics Research Center at the University of Minnesota was highlighted.

  • More by Nathan Porter »
  • References

    1. Marvin So, Rebecca L. Freese, and Andrew J. Barnes, “Pushed Out and Drawn In: Exclusionary Discipline, Mental Health, and Protective Factors Among Youth in Public Schools,” Journal of School Health 94, no. 2 (2024): 128-37.

    2. American Academy of Pediatrics Council on School Health, “Out-of-School Suspension and Expulsion,” Pediatrics 131, no. 3 (2013): e1000-7.

    Primary Sidebar

    Categories

    • Research News

    Tags

    • child well-being
    • education

    Authors

    • Nathan Porter

    Centers

    • Minnesota Population Center, University of Minnesota

    Explore the Research Centers

    • Bowling Green State University
    • Brown University
    • Columbia University
    • Duke University
    • Johns Hopkins University
    • Ohio State University
    • Pennsylvania State University
    • Population Reference Bureau
    • University of California, Berkeley
    • University of California, Los Angeles
    • University of Colorado, Boulder
    • University of Maryland
    • University of Michigan
    • University of Minnesota
    • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
    • University of Pennsylvania
    • University of Texas at Austin
    • University of Washington
    • University of Wisconsin-Madison

    Search All Centers

    Conduct a custom search across the Population Dynamics Research Centers. Up to 100 results.

    Footer

    • Contact
    • Centers
    • Twitter

    News and Publications

    Receive our monthly email listing newly published articles and new grants at each of the Centers.

    This website was prepared by the Center for Public Information on Population Research (CPIPR) at the Population Reference Bureau (PRB) for the Population Dynamics Research Centers. This website is made possible by the generous support of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD).